<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin Flynn&#039;s Inside Lane &#187; Ski Train</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inside-lane.com/tag/ski-train/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inside-lane.com</link>
	<description>News and commentary about Colorado transportation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Amtrak: Statement on cancellation of proposed Ski Train resumption blames Iowa Pacific for not providing certified safe vehicles</title>
		<link>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/amtrak-statement-on-cancellation-of-proposed-ski-train-resumption-blames-iowa-pacific-for-not-providing-certified-safe-vehicles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/amtrak-statement-on-cancellation-of-proposed-ski-train-resumption-blames-iowa-pacific-for-not-providing-certified-safe-vehicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ski Train]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inside-lane.com/?p=2701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Amtrak Press Statement</strong>

CHICAGO — “Amtrak was willing to help bring the ski train back after Iowa Pacific Holdings (IPH) could not arrange with Union Pacific (UP) to provide train crews to operate a ski train over UP owned tracks, as UP had in the past. We worked for three months on a plan to run these trains for IPH while not putting our scheduled intercity passenger trains – and U.S. taxpayers – at risk.

“Two days before Amtrak planned to operate a test train for IPH and five days before the start of its season, IPH could not provide to Amtrak a federally certified safe train to operate and adequate insurance. IPH has not been able to supply locomotives with adequate power and brakes to even test their rented railcars back and forth into the mountains. Nevertheless, since October IPH sold tickets for a schedule they knew could not be met even in the best circumstances. 

“IPH had many things to put in place before the ski train could become a reality and their failure to execute their own plans is why this train never left the station.”
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amtrak Press Statement</strong></p>
<p>CHICAGO — “Amtrak was willing to help bring the ski train back after Iowa Pacific Holdings (IPH) could not arrange with Union Pacific (UP) to provide train crews to operate a ski train over UP owned tracks, as UP had in the past. We worked for three months on a plan to run these trains for IPH while not putting our scheduled intercity passenger trains – and U.S. taxpayers – at risk.</p>
<p>“Two days before Amtrak planned to operate a test train for IPH and five days before the start of its season, IPH could not provide to Amtrak a federally certified safe train to operate and adequate insurance. IPH has not been able to supply locomotives with adequate power and brakes to even test their rented railcars back and forth into the mountains. Nevertheless, since October IPH sold tickets for a schedule they knew could not be met even in the best circumstances. </p>
<p>“IPH had many things to put in place before the ski train could become a reality and their failure to execute their own plans is why this train never left the station.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/amtrak-statement-on-cancellation-of-proposed-ski-train-resumption-blames-iowa-pacific-for-not-providing-certified-safe-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7News: Ski Train resumption canceled by Iowa Pacific Holdings</title>
		<link>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/7news-ski-train-resumption-canceled-by-iowa-pacific-holdings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/7news-ski-train-resumption-canceled-by-iowa-pacific-holdings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ski Train]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inside-lane.com/?p=2698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iowa Pacific Holdings, which had proposed to take over operation of the Ski Train to Winter Park from Denver Union Station, cancelled those plans on Monday, <a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/22076292/detail.html">7News KMGH-TV reports</a>.

Iowa Pacific Holdings has not been able to reach an operational agreement with Amtrak, which was to provide crews to operate the train.

<a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/22076292/detail.html">Go to The Denver Channel at 7News to see the entire story</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iowa Pacific Holdings, which had proposed to take over operation of the Ski Train to Winter Park from Denver Union Station, cancelled those plans on Monday, <a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/22076292/detail.html">7News KMGH-TV reports</a>.</p>
<p>Iowa Pacific Holdings has not been able to reach an operational agreement with Amtrak, which was to provide crews to operate the train.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/22076292/detail.html">Go to The Denver Channel at 7News to see the entire story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/28/7news-ski-train-resumption-canceled-by-iowa-pacific-holdings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amtrak: Read Amtrak&#8217;s legal response to attempts to force it to operate new Ski Train venture</title>
		<link>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/23/amtrak-read-amtraks-legal-response-to-attempts-to-force-it-to-operate-new-ski-train-venture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/23/amtrak-read-amtraks-legal-response-to-attempts-to-force-it-to-operate-new-ski-train-venture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ski Train]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inside-lane.com/?p=2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amtrak filed a response to Iowa Pacific Holding's request for an injunction that asked the federal court in Denver to force Amtrak to run Iowa Pacific's resumption of the Ski Train from Denver to Winter Park.

Among other things, Amtrak says the locomotives and passenger cars Iowa Pacific wants to use failed a federal safety inspection, that union Pacific has yet to consent to allow the service on its tracks and that federal staffing rules require a second crew that Amtrak does not have to operate the train.

<a href="http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&#038;pid=gmail&#038;attid=0.1&#038;thid=125b98e46eac0bb9&#038;mt=application%2Fpdf&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.google.com%2Fmail%2F%3Fui%3D2%26ik%3D56f046d04a%26view%3Datt%26th%3D125b98e46eac0bb9%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dattd%26zw&#038;sig=AHIEtbTtT_9lP-lyogYZZSDXqPv-Vcr3iw&#038;pli=1">You can read Amtrak's reasons for opposing the request here</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amtrak filed a response to Iowa Pacific Holding&#8217;s request for an injunction that asked the federal court in Denver to force Amtrak to run Iowa Pacific&#8217;s resumption of the Ski Train from Denver to Winter Park.</p>
<p>Among other things, Amtrak says the locomotives and passenger cars Iowa Pacific wants to use failed a federal safety inspection, that union Pacific has yet to consent to allow the service on its tracks and that federal staffing rules require a second crew that Amtrak does not have to operate the train.</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&#038;pid=gmail&#038;attid=0.1&#038;thid=125b98e46eac0bb9&#038;mt=application%2Fpdf&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.google.com%2Fmail%2F%3Fui%3D2%26ik%3D56f046d04a%26view%3Datt%26th%3D125b98e46eac0bb9%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dattd%26zw&#038;sig=AHIEtbTtT_9lP-lyogYZZSDXqPv-Vcr3iw&#038;pli=1">You can read Amtrak&#8217;s reasons for opposing the request here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/23/amtrak-read-amtraks-legal-response-to-attempts-to-force-it-to-operate-new-ski-train-venture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amtrak: No Ski Train service yet; agreement stalled over staffing, equipment and liability issues</title>
		<link>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/22/amtrak-no-ski-train-this-year-agreement-falls-through-over-staffing-equipment-and-liability-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/22/amtrak-no-ski-train-this-year-agreement-falls-through-over-staffing-equipment-and-liability-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ski Train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inside-lane.com/?p=2655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Amtrak Press Release</strong>

STATEMENT FROM AMTRAK
ON IMPASSE TO REACH FINAL OPERATING CONTRACT
FOR SKI TRAIN TO WINTER PARK, COLORADO
 
CHICAGO — “Iowa Pacific Holdings, LLC (IPH) does not have an agreement with Amtrak to begin operation of the ski train service between Denver and Winter Park, Colo., on December 27, 2009.

“Amtrak was first asked in August to consider operating the train for IPH.  Although since that time Amtrak has engaged in negotiations with IPH to supply the locomotive engineers and conductors to operate the train equipment provided by IPH over tracks owned by Union Pacific Railroad, no final contract has been reached due to unresolved issues related to staffing requirements, passenger railcar equipment, and liability. 

“Additionally, Amtrak has not received notice that IPH has achieved compliance with all applicable federal rail safety regulations.

“It is unfortunate that IPH marketed and sold tickets for the ski train without first making certain it was able to provide the service.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amtrak Press Release</strong></p>
<p>STATEMENT FROM AMTRAK<br />
ON IMPASSE TO REACH FINAL OPERATING CONTRACT<br />
FOR SKI TRAIN TO WINTER PARK, COLORADO</p>
<p>CHICAGO — “Iowa Pacific Holdings, LLC (IPH) does not have an agreement with Amtrak to begin operation of the ski train service between Denver and Winter Park, Colo., on December 27, 2009.</p>
<p>“Amtrak was first asked in August to consider operating the train for IPH.  Although since that time Amtrak has engaged in negotiations with IPH to supply the locomotive engineers and conductors to operate the train equipment provided by IPH over tracks owned by Union Pacific Railroad, no final contract has been reached due to unresolved issues related to staffing requirements, passenger railcar equipment, and liability. </p>
<p>“Additionally, Amtrak has not received notice that IPH has achieved compliance with all applicable federal rail safety regulations.</p>
<p>“It is unfortunate that IPH marketed and sold tickets for the ski train without first making certain it was able to provide the service.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inside-lane.com/2009/12/22/amtrak-no-ski-train-this-year-agreement-falls-through-over-staffing-equipment-and-liability-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

